The first four bullets echoed into the dark just as Elijah Hadley let go of the BB gun.
He did exactly what the deputy asked. Dropped the replica pistol in the brush. Raised his hands. Shouted, “It’s just a BB gun!”
But Deputy Jacob Diaz-Austin had already opened fire—once, twice, again. Hadley stumbled backward, fell onto the highway shoulder, and screamed. The bodycam caught it: a seventeen-year-old kid lying facedown in the dirt, crying out for help.
“You’re going to kill me… I’m going to die.”
Three and a half minutes passed. No medical aid, no approach. Just commands barked from behind a Glock. When Hadley tried to roll over, Diaz-Austin reloaded and emptied his magazine again. By the end, the deputy had fired 22 times—most after Elijah was already bleeding on the ground.
In Otero County, New Mexico, that’s what passed for a welfare check.
What followed has become one of the most scrutinized rural police shootings in years. First-degree murder charges. A civil rights lawsuit. Tribal protests. And the reappearance of a hard question, asked this time in Apache, English, and legalese: how did a check on a kid walking home turn into a firing squad?
At the time of the shooting, Diaz-Austin was 28, two years into his job. In an internal affairs interview, he said he saw a “sinister smile” on Hadley’s face. He used the phrase twice, as if rehearsed. Then added, “He wasn’t being overly emotional… he was relatively still.”
He couldn’t explain why that made him pull the trigger.
“He did everything he was told, and they still killed him.”
That’s how Valerie Espinoza put it, standing beside a roadside memorial marked by a wooden cross and plastic flowers. She wasn’t Hadley’s relative, just a neighbor from the Mescalero Apache community who couldn’t make sense of it. “He dropped the BB gun. He didn’t run. He followed orders.”
What shook the family more came later. In September 2024, the Otero County Sheriff’s Office reinstated Diaz-Austin. They said he acted “within policy and training.” He was back on duty even as state investigators were still combing over dashcam footage.
“When we found out he was patrolling again, we felt like the whole thing was being erased,” said family friend Kristin Bryce. “Like maybe justice wouldn’t come.”
The sheriff refused interviews. Instead, he lashed out at reporters. “Karma is coming,” he told one. In court, deputies laughed with Diaz-Austin between hearings.
Those courtroom exchanges didn’t go unnoticed by the legal team representing Hadley’s family.
“The deputy called him ‘bro’ and ‘dog,’ then shot him over and over.”
That was how Tyson Logan, the Hadley family’s attorney, described it to the press. He pointed out that the first shots were already unnecessary—but the second volley, after a pause and reload, shattered every principle of use-of-force training.
“That wasn’t split-second panic. That was execution over time.”
And still, the sheriff’s department backed it. “Compliant with training,” the memo read. That sentence now hangs over every rural agency in New Mexico. If that’s the standard, what happens next time someone calls for help?
That question sparked a wider reckoning—not just about one officer, but about the rules he followed.
Training manuals used by many sheriff’s offices emphasize control over communication. Officers are told not to let a subject “close distance,” to respond to threats “decisively and without hesitation.” But Hadley wasn’t closing distance. He was lying still. Bleeding. Trying to speak.
In Albuquerque, a mental health crisis call brings out unarmed responders trained in de-escalation. But Otero County is different. Deputies patrol alone, miles from backup, trained to expect danger first and sort it out later. The mindset is paramilitary. And the numbers prove it.
Last year, sheriff’s departments made up a third of all fatal police shootings in the country. New Mexico led the nation in per-capita police killings. The trend isn’t slowing.
“Numbers like that stay abstract—until a roadside becomes a memorial.”
On a summer evening in August, mourners walked the same stretch of Highway 70 where Hadley died. Some carried candles. Others held signs. One teenage cousin laid down cedar branches and whispered:
“We’re not supposed to talk after death. But if we stay silent, they’ll say nothing happened.”
That silence never quite settled. It kept leaking into interviews, courtrooms, walkouts, petitions. One protester said it plain on a local radio show:
“This wasn’t a welfare check. That was a felony stop.”
The phrase stuck. Because to the community, what happened wasn’t a tragic miscalculation. It was a system functioning as designed. A policy, applied as trained. And it ended in a teenager’s death.
That death, and the department’s defense of it, are now headed to trial.
Diaz-Austin has pleaded not guilty. The Hadley family’s civil suit could become the first major test of New Mexico’s law ending qualified immunity for public officials. If it succeeds, it may rewrite how accountability works in counties where sheriffs rarely answer to anyone but themselves.
But none of that changes what happened on the asphalt that night.
A kid dropped a toy gun.
An officer opened fire.
And somewhere in the brush, under gravel and scrub, that BB gun still lies untouched—proof that Elijah Hadley tried to comply.
And that it wasn’t enough.
Bibliography
1. Source New Mexico. “Fatal Shooting of Mescalero Apache Teen by Otero Deputy Sparks Murder Charge and Policing Scrutiny.” SourceNM.com. Accessed July 2025. https://sourcenm.com.
2. KOAT-TV (Albuquerque). “Bodycam Footage, Attorney Statements, and Reaction to Elijah Hadley Shooting.” KOAT.com. Accessed July 2025. https://koat.com.
3. KFOX14 El Paso. “State Police Investigate Fatal Deputy Shooting in Otero County.” KFOXTV.com. Accessed July 2025. https://kfoxtv.com.
4. 2nd Life Media. “Otero Sheriff Reinstates Deputy Following Deadly Welfare Check.” 2ndLifeMediaAlamogordo.Town.News. Accessed July 2025. https://2ndlifemediaalamogordo.town.news.
5. Livemint. “Rural Sheriff Killings Rise: A National Pattern Behind the Hadley Case.” LiveMint.com. Accessed July 2025. https://livemint.com.
6. Artesia Daily Press. “Courtroom Tensions in Hadley Murder Case Prompt Venue Change Motion.” ArtesiaNews.com. Accessed July 2025. https://artesianews.com.
7. The Wall Street Journal. “Small-Town Sheriffs Use Lethal Force at Higher Rates Than Urban Police.” WSJ.com. Accessed July 2025. https://wallstreetjournal.com.
Thanks for bringing the tragic loss of this teenage boy’s death to our attention. There is now some hope for justice with the Civil Suit being filed. More often than many are aware, a civil suit can possibly bring about changes for the better within a system that is suspect for employing rigid rules, especially when a criminal case has not resulted in a criminal offense.
So, for this particular case in the outlands of Otero County, New Mexico there is radical hope a civil suit will result in some justice for a young man’s death by a deputy of the law.